ICT third-party risk

ICT third-party risk evidence workflows.

Connect ICT provider records and service relationships to contracts, evidence, ownership, reviews, and DORA Register of Information preparation.

Straight answer

Why do ICT third-party records create rework?

Provider names, service relationships, contracts, functions, and evidence often live in different tools and use different identifiers. RegAtlas is designed to make those links explicit and route discrepancies to people before output preparation.

Decision boundary

The workflow supports evidence and review; it does not calculate or certify an institution's regulatory status.

How the workflow runs

From fragmented inputs to a reviewed operating record.

01

Structure the work

Turn records, obligations, evidence, owners, and deadlines into linked operating objects.

02

Gate the decisions

Route changes through named reviewers and approvers, with rationale and exceptions retained.

03

Prepare repeatable outputs

Use version history and source lineage to prepare exports without rebuilding the evidence chain.

Built-in boundaries

Automation assists. Named people decide.

Source lineage stays visible
Review and approval remain attributable
Synthetic data stays labeled
Legal interpretation stays with qualified people
Official source: EUR-Lex: Regulation (EU) 2022/2554
Early Access

Request early access to RegAtlas.

We're talking to a small group of design partners building a more operational approach to EU regulatory execution.